Prop firm comparison

FTMO vs FundingPips

Evidence, program, and rule comparison

Recorded rules, programs, and platforms from FXVeritas research files. Not a ranking, recommendation, or safety rating.

Research coverage
Research file
Recorded research programs
2
Research coverage
Rules on file
Recorded research programs
5

Counts here are recorded research programs. Directory catalog program counts can differ.

This page compares facts currently recorded in the FXVeritas prop firm research dataset. Program-level values may vary within each firm, so program-derived rows are shown as recorded spans or marked as program-dependent instead of a single firm-wide rule. Values that are not recorded stay unrecorded and are never estimated.

Key differences at a glance

Recorded differences and overlaps only. Missing values stay Not recorded. This is not a ranking.

6 differences shown

FTMO

FundingPips

  • Profit target

    Different

    10%

    12%

  • Max loss

    Different

    10%

    6–12%

  • Evaluation model

    Different

    1-step2-step

    1-step2-stepInstant

  • Recorded reward split across programs with available data

    Different

    80–90%

    Not recorded

  • Recorded research programs

    Different

    2

    5

  • Operator

    Different

    FTMO

    FTMO Evaluation Global s.r.o.

    FundingPips

    Not recorded

Optional

Refine by program (optional)

Firm comparison is the default. Selecting a program creates an exact program-level comparison. Exact match only — no sibling substitution.

Full evidence matrix

The research matrix below keeps every recorded firm-level field. Same and Different describe recorded values, not a ranking.

Differences first

Open a topic to compare the recorded facts. These are differences, not a recommendation or an overall winner.

Evidence snapshot

Research coverage

FTMO

Research file

FundingPips

Rules on file

Programs

Recorded research programs

Research inventory on this comparison. Directory catalog program counts can differ.

FTMO

2

FundingPips

5
Evaluation models on file

FTMO

1-step · 2-step

FundingPips

1-step · 2-step · Instant
Program names on file

FTMO

Challenge 1-Step · Challenge 2-Step

FundingPips

2-Step · 2-Step Pro · 2-Step Flex · 1-Step Flex · Zero
Account sizes on programs with recorded size data

Derived from recorded programs, not a single firm claim.

FTMO

$100,000

FundingPips

Not recorded

Evaluation rules

Profit target across recorded programs

FTMO

10%

FundingPips

12%
Max loss across recorded programs

FTMO

10%

FundingPips

6%–12%
Drawdown

FTMO

Varies across recorded programs

FundingPips

Not recorded

Trading rules

News trading

FTMO

Conditional

FundingPips

Not recorded
Weekend holding

FTMO

Conditional

FundingPips

Not recorded
EA / automated trading

FTMO

Conditional

FundingPips

Not recorded
Platforms

FTMO

cTrader / MT4 / MT5 / TradingView

FundingPips

cTrader / Match-Trader / MT5

Payout / rewards

Recorded reward split across programs with available data

Derived from recorded programs, not a single firm claim.

FTMO

80%–90%

FundingPips

Not recorded
Payout frequency

FTMO

Other

FundingPips

Not recorded
First payout on programs with recorded timing

Derived from recorded programs, not a single firm claim.

FTMO

14 days

FundingPips

Not recorded

Operator / company

Operating entity

FTMO

FTMO Evaluation Global s.r.o.

FundingPips

Not recorded
Jurisdiction

FTMO

Czechia

FundingPips

Not recorded
Open the complete comparison

Evidence snapshot

1 different · 3 fields

Show

Research coverage, last checked, and whether sources are on file.

FTMO

FundingPips

Research coverage

Different
Research file
Open FTMO profile
Rules on file
Open FundingPips profile

Last checked

Same
Aug 23, 2026
Open FTMO profile
Aug 23, 2026
Open FundingPips profile

Recorded sources

Same
Recorded
Open FTMO profile
Recorded
Open FundingPips profile

Programs

4 different · 4 fields

Show

Recorded program inventory and evaluation models on file. Aggregates stay scoped to recorded programs.

FTMO

FundingPips

Recorded research programs

Different
2
Open FTMO profile
5
Open FundingPips profile

Evaluation models on file

Different
1-step · 2-step
Open FTMO profile
1-step · 2-step · Instant
Open FundingPips profile

Program names on file

Different
Challenge 1-Step · Challenge 2-Step
Open FTMO profile
2-Step · 2-Step Pro · 2-Step Flex · 1-Step Flex · Zero
Open FundingPips profile

Account sizes on programs with recorded size data

Different
$100,000
Open FTMO profile
Not recorded
Open FundingPips profile

Evaluation rules

3 different · 4 fields

Show

Profit target, loss limits, and drawdown as recorded across programs — not a single firm rule.

FTMO

FundingPips

Profit target across recorded programs

Different
10%
Open FTMO profile
12%
Open FundingPips profile

Max loss across recorded programs

Different
10%
Open FTMO profile
6%–12%
Open FundingPips profile

Daily loss across recorded programs

Same
3%–5%
Open FTMO profile
3%–5%
Open FundingPips profile

Drawdown

Different
Varies across recorded programs
Open FTMO profile
Not recorded
Open FundingPips profile

Trading rules

4 different · 4 fields

Show

Recorded trading policies. Values that vary stay labelled as varying across recorded programs.

FTMO

FundingPips

News trading

Different
Conditional
Open FTMO profile
Not recorded
Open FundingPips profile

Weekend holding

Different
Conditional
Open FTMO profile
Not recorded
Open FundingPips profile

EA / automated trading

Different
Conditional
Open FTMO profile
Not recorded
Open FundingPips profile

Platforms

Different
cTrader / MT4 / MT5 / TradingView
Open FTMO profile
cTrader / Match-Trader / MT5
Open FundingPips profile

Payout / rewards

3 different · 3 fields

Show

Company-published payout and reward terms. Not independently verified payout performance.

FTMO

FundingPips

Recorded reward split across programs with available data

Different
80%–90%
Open FTMO profile
Not recorded
Open FundingPips profile

Payout frequency

Different
Other
Open FTMO profile
Not recorded
Open FundingPips profile

First payout on programs with recorded timing

Different
14 days
Open FTMO profile
Not recorded
Open FundingPips profile

Operator / company

2 different · 2 fields

Show

Operating entity recorded in the research file.

FTMO

FundingPips

Operating entity

Different
FTMO Evaluation Global s.r.o.
Open FTMO profile
Not recorded
Open FundingPips profile

Jurisdiction

Different
Czechia
Open FTMO profile
Not recorded
Open FundingPips profile

Research and source context

Recorded evidence notes and scope for this comparison.

4 recorded differences

Show

4 recorded differences in this pair

  • FTMO records 2 programs in this dataset and FundingPips records 5 programs.
  • Max loss across recorded programs: FTMO records 10%, FundingPips records 6%–12%. FundingPips spans the wider recorded range.
  • Profit target across recorded programs: FTMO records 10%, FundingPips records 12%.
  • FTMO has a verified contracting operator recorded. FundingPips does not.
  • Daily loss across recorded programs: both firms record 3%–5%.
  • Primary sources recorded so far: 3 for FTMO, 3 for FundingPips.

Observations describe what is recorded, not which firm is better.

Primary sources and evidence

Evidence behind the recorded values, one column per firm.

Research the programs

Programs at either firm with enough recorded research to hold their own page.

Every eligible program is listed for both firms. Partner status does not decide which programs appear here.

How this comparison is built

FXVeritas maintains a fixed set of prop firm comparisons where both sides carry enough recorded research to support a useful comparison. Values are read from the research dataset at request time. Program facts stay program-scoped: FXVeritas does not average program values, pick a representative program, or infer a firm-wide rule from program rows.

Open FTMO and FundingPips in the interactive comparison

Browse all researched prop firms