Prop firm compare
Prop firm comparison
Compare recorded evidence, programs, and rules — not popularity. Up to three firms. Program refinement is optional and never auto-selected.
Recorded evidence for up to three firms. Program refinement is optional.
Evidence scope: Firm-first comparison
Firm-level rows use recorded ranges across programs. Program refinement is optional and never auto-selected.
Prop firm directory
- Research coverage
- Research file
- Recorded research programs
- 6
- Research coverage
- Rules on file
- Recorded research programs
- 5
Counts here are recorded research programs. Directory catalog program counts can differ.
Key differences at a glance
Recorded differences and overlaps only. Missing values stay Not recorded. This is not a ranking.
6 differences shown
FundedNext
FundingPips
Profit target
Different10–25%
12%
Max loss
Different6–10%
6–12%
Evaluation model
Different1-step2-step
1-step2-stepInstant
Recorded research programs
Different6
5
Operator
DifferentGrowthNext – F.Z.E.
Not recorded
Research coverage
DifferentResearch file
Rules on file
Optional
Refine by program (optional)
Firm comparison is the default. Selecting a program creates an exact program-level comparison. Exact match only — no sibling substitution.
Full evidence matrix
The research matrix below keeps every recorded firm-level field. Same and Different describe recorded values, not a ranking.
Differences first
Open a topic to compare the recorded facts. These are differences, not a recommendation or an overall winner.
Evidence snapshot
Research coverage
FundedNext
FundingPips
Programs
Recorded research programs
Research inventory on this comparison. Directory catalog program counts can differ.
FundedNext
FundingPips
Evaluation models on file
FundedNext
FundingPips
Program names on file
FundedNext
FundingPips
Evaluation rules
Profit target across recorded programs
FundedNext
FundingPips
Max loss across recorded programs
FundedNext
FundingPips
Trading rules
Platforms
FundedNext
FundingPips
Operator / company
Operating entity
FundedNext
FundingPips
Jurisdiction
FundedNext
FundingPips
Open the complete comparison
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
Evidence snapshotResearch coverage, last checked, and whether sources are on file. | ||
Research coverageDifferent | Research file | Rules on file |
Last checkedSame | Aug 23, 2026 | Aug 23, 2026 |
Recorded sourcesSame | Recorded | Recorded |
ProgramsRecorded program inventory and evaluation models on file. Aggregates stay scoped to recorded programs. | ||
Recorded research programsDifferent Research inventory on this comparison. Directory catalog program counts can differ. | 6 | 5 |
Evaluation models on fileDifferent | 1-step · 2-step | 1-step · 2-step · Instant |
Program names on fileDifferent | Stellar 2-Step · Stellar 1-Step · Evaluation · Express · Stellar Lite · Futures Challenge | 2-Step · 2-Step Pro · 2-Step Flex · 1-Step Flex · Zero |
Evaluation rulesProfit target, loss limits, and drawdown as recorded across programs — not a single firm rule. | ||
Profit target across recorded programsDifferent | 10%–25% | 12% |
Max loss across recorded programsDifferent | 6%–10% | 6%–12% |
Daily loss across recorded programsSame | 3%–5% | 3%–5% |
Trading rulesRecorded trading policies. Values that vary stay labelled as varying across recorded programs. | ||
PlatformsDifferent | cTrader / Match-Trader / MT4 / MT5 | cTrader / Match-Trader / MT5 |
Operator / companyOperating entity recorded in the research file. | ||
Operating entityDifferent | GrowthNext – F.Z.E. | Not recorded |
JurisdictionDifferent | United Arab Emirates | Not recorded |
Evidence snapshot
1 different · 3 fields
ShowHide
Evidence snapshot
1 different · 3 fields
Research coverage, last checked, and whether sources are on file.
FundedNext
FundingPips
Research coverage
DifferentLast checked
SameRecorded sources
SamePrograms
3 different · 3 fields
ShowHide
Programs
3 different · 3 fields
Recorded program inventory and evaluation models on file. Aggregates stay scoped to recorded programs.
FundedNext
FundingPips
Recorded research programs
DifferentEvaluation models on file
DifferentProgram names on file
DifferentEvaluation rules
2 different · 3 fields
ShowHide
Evaluation rules
2 different · 3 fields
Profit target, loss limits, and drawdown as recorded across programs — not a single firm rule.
FundedNext
FundingPips
Profit target across recorded programs
DifferentMax loss across recorded programs
DifferentDaily loss across recorded programs
SameTrading rules
1 different · 1 fields
ShowHide
Trading rules
1 different · 1 fields
Recorded trading policies. Values that vary stay labelled as varying across recorded programs.
FundedNext
FundingPips
Platforms
DifferentOperator / company
2 different · 2 fields
ShowHide
Operator / company
2 different · 2 fields
Operating entity recorded in the research file.
FundedNext
FundingPips
Operating entity
DifferentJurisdiction
DifferentResearch and source context
Factual overlaps and differences drawn only from recorded research files. Not a recommendation.
5 recorded differences in this pair
- FundedNext records 6 programs in this dataset and FundingPips records 5 programs.
- Max loss across recorded programs: FundedNext records 6%–10%, FundingPips records 6%–12%. FundingPips spans the wider recorded range.
- Profit target across recorded programs: FundedNext records 10%–25%, FundingPips records 12%. FundedNext spans the wider recorded range.
- FundedNext has a verified contracting operator recorded. FundingPips does not.
- Primary sources recorded so far: 4 for FundedNext, 3 for FundingPips.
- Daily loss across recorded programs: both firms record 3%–5%.
Observations describe what is recorded, not which firm is better.
Research and source context
Recorded evidence notes and scope for this comparison.
5 recorded differences
ShowHide
Research and source context
Recorded evidence notes and scope for this comparison.
5 recorded differences
5 recorded differences in this pair
- FundedNext records 6 programs in this dataset and FundingPips records 5 programs.
- Max loss across recorded programs: FundedNext records 6%–10%, FundingPips records 6%–12%. FundingPips spans the wider recorded range.
- Profit target across recorded programs: FundedNext records 10%–25%, FundingPips records 12%. FundedNext spans the wider recorded range.
- FundedNext has a verified contracting operator recorded. FundingPips does not.
- Primary sources recorded so far: 4 for FundedNext, 3 for FundingPips.
- Daily loss across recorded programs: both firms record 3%–5%.
Observations describe what is recorded, not which firm is better.
Optional partner offers
Commercial relationships are listed after the research comparison and do not affect matrix rows or scope.
Partner offers and codes are disclosed separately. They do not influence firm ordering, comparison rows, evidence state, or conclusions.
FundedNext
- Partner offer
- 7–10% OFF
- Code
- FXVERITAS
FundingPips
No current partner offer
